|
Welcome
to another issue of the High Tech AIDCourier. This month is an expanded
version of the newsletter as we try to get all the news covered. For those
of you into the Biometrics field, there is a lot more news. And this month
we broaden the horizons to cover other technologies.
Feel free to pass this issue on to your friends and
colleagues. The subscription information is on the last page. Apologies to
anyone who tried to subscribe last month and failed, our web host had
problems with the servers and we lost the forms capability.
Are you interested in reading more information about the
AIDC industry? Including a monthly column from yours truly? Well now you
can. Scan, The Data Capture Report will now include a monthly
column from me on technical issues. The newsletter is available twice a
month, by subscription, and you can get the details from http://www.hightechaid.com/scandcr.htm
If you received this newsletter, but you are not yet a
subscriber, then see the "Fine Print" at the end for details on
subscribing.
If the links in the newsletter appear to be broken, then
copy and paste the full link in your browser.
If you have a topic to cover, a point to make, or even
just a comment on how we are doing, then send it to news@hightechaid.com.
â In the Supreme Court
case, Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., LTD. The
judges unanimously ruled to restore patent holders' ability to protect
their amended patents from "equivalent" products. Bloomberg
reported on May 28, that the "ruling may prove to be the most
significant Supreme Court patent decision in two decades, affecting as
many as 90 percent of the 1.2 million patents now in force, lawyers
said.". For more information, see: http://www.ieeeusa.org/releases/2002/052802pr.html
â The National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently held a symposium on standards
called "Standards in the Global Economy: Past, Present, and
Future". The proceedings of this symposium are now available at: http://ts.nist.gov/ts/htdocs/210/216/sp974-pdf/sp974-toc.htm.
â On May 23, Rep. Jim
Sensenbrenner (R-WI) introduced the Standards Development Organization
Advancement Act of 2002 (H.R. 4849) with bipartisan support (US House of
representatives). The bill would limit the potential antitrust liability
of standards development organizations whose standards are adopted by the
federal government from treble damages to actual damages. See bill
language at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.4849:
â The IEEE Standards
Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board has approved the IEEE Standard
802.15.1(R), "Wireless MAC and PHY Specifications for Wireless
Personal Area Networks," adapted from portions of the Bluetooth(TM)
wireless specification. "The new standard gives the Bluetooth spec
greater validity and support in the market and is an additional resource
for those who implement Bluetooth devices," says Ian Gifford, Vice
Chair of the IEEE 802.15 Working Group. For more information, visit: http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/802151app.html
â The IEEE 802(R) Local
and Metropolitan Area Networks Standards Committee (LMSC) recently
approved the formation of a new technical advisory group dedicated to
addressing radio regulations as they impact developing wireless standards.
The overarching objective of the IEEE 802.18 Advisory Group is to act as
the 802 radio regulatory expert and interface with national regulatory
bodies, such as the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as well
as with international regulatory bodies. For more information, visit: http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/80218app.html
Looking for the next breakthrough that is going to take us
into the next technological millennium? How about this:
â Super-fast, ultra-tough
transistors of gallium nitride could help usher in broadband wireless
communications, better hybrid electric cars, compact radars, and dozens of
other breakthroughs. Researchers say that high-power transistors could
amplify signals at the highest frequencies and power levels of all
semiconductors. Read more: www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/may02/gani.html
â NASA (National
Aeronautics and Space Administration) are always working on those way out
wacky things that we need to know – like what happens to water in zero
gravity! In this case NASA performed experiments in which water balloons
were popped in zero-gravity environments to see what would happen to the
water. Now zero-G can only be maintained in an aircraft for 25 seconds or
so, and thus we have a series of 25 second videos showing that water doesn’t
splash everywhere when you pop the balloon. Take a look: http://microgravity.grc.nasa.gov@836.as/?c38c
Last month we concentrated on some issues about Biometrics
to give you some place to start thinking. This month we will open the door
even wider, and see that problems are not just the domain of fingerprints:
â But first, lest we
think that reproducibility of the Biometric itself is the only part of the
security issue, check out Roger Clark’s work at the Australian National
University on the creation of false biometrics based on the template
features: http://cs.anu.edu.au/honours/topics.html#biometrics.
And then to spark more discussion try this article that helps set the
issues on the table: http://www.biometricsdirect.com/Web/smart_card.htm
â IATA (the International
Air Transport Association) has said that a global biometric standard needs
to be created to allow everyone to be screened in an effective manner. The
New York Times published an article ( http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-airlines-iata-safety.html?pagewanted=print&position=top
) talking about arming pilots but including a statement that "Some
U.S. airlines are already using biometrics to screen employees and the
trend is gaining support in Europe, IATA says. But for biometrics to be
effective for international air travel, global standards are needed …"
So how can we go about Global Standards for Biometrics? As
I reported last month, there was a vote to create a new Biometrics Sub
Committee at the ISO JTC1 level. How did it do? Well the ballot closed on
June 3, 2002, and a new SubCommittee on Biometrics and the offer from the
US to serve as Secretariat has been approved via a majority of the
P-members voting (12 to 9). The new SC is designated JTC1/SC 37.
Many of the negative votes seem to settle around the fact that other
committees are already doing work in Biometrics (JTC1/SC17 for card based,
JTC1/SC 29 (WG11) is looking at Face recognition technology, many of the
digital imaging techniques rely on various imaging standards, as well as
ISO/TC 68, JTC 1/SC 27 and JTC 1/SC 31). Of course in the USA, INCITS (InterNational
Committee for Information Technology Standards) has already formed INCITS
M1 and they had several meetings. Go to http://www.ncits.org/tc_home/m1.htm
for the latest news. If you live outside the USA and are interested in the
work of this International Committee, I suggest you visit the web site of
your local ISO National Body and get more information. If you are not sure
who your National Body is, visit the ISO page http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/aboutiso/isomembers/MemberList.MemberSummary?MEMBERCODE=10
for a list of members.
â In other work, the
American Association for Motor Vehicle Administrators (a US organization
that controls drivers licenses amongst other things) have already included
a section on fingerprints in their standard: http://www.aamva.org/Documents/stdAAMVADLIDStandrd000630.pdf
and in the UK, CESG (the Information Security arm of GCHQ)
has several documents to help you implement Biometrics and a report on
testing of Biometrics: http://www.cesg.gov.uk/technology/biometrics/media/Biometrics%20Advice.pdf
and http://www.cesg.gov.uk/technology/biometrics/media/Biometric%20Test%20Report%20pt1.pdf
â And what about other
forms of Biometrics, are they secure? The Register, a UK IT News website
reports: "Face recognition kit fails in Fla airport" http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/25444.html.
The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) posted the test results on their
web site at: "Facial Recognition System Test ( Phase I )
Summary" http://www.aclu.org/issues/privacy/FaceRec_data.pdf
.
The full spectrum of the test seems to be unclear, as does
the scientific-ness of the test, but Visionics published a response to the
report at: http://ir.shareholder.com/vsnx/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=81549
The ACLU also has a commentary "ACLU Blasts Plan to
Use Flawed Facial Recognition System at Statue of Liberty and Other NY
Landmarks" which can be read here: http://www.aclu.org/news/2002/n052402a.html
â Finally for this month:
The Register reports on some tests performed by the German magazine c’t.
"Biometric sensors beaten senseless in tests"; http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/25400.html
show that Biometrics may not be ready for the big time. There are several
other interesting links in this article.
To put a semblance of officialness into all this (at least
from a USA perspective), here is the list of current US government
legislations that are working their way towards law: Visit http://thomas.loc.gov/
and submit the bill number in the search engine.
-
Aviation Security Technology Enhancement Act
(Introduced in House) [H.R.3101.IH]
-
Affordable Small Business Stimulus Act of 2001
(Introduced in Senate) [S.1676.IS]
-
Hazmat Endorsement Requirements Act (Introduced in
Senate) [S.1750.IS]
-
Cybersecurity Research and Education Act of 2002
(Introduced in Senate) [S.1901.IS]
-
Aviation Security Act (Engrossed as Agreed to or
Passed by Senate) [S.1447.ES]
-
Aviation Security Act, II (Introduced in House)
[H.R.3165.IH]
-
Transportation Security Enhancement Act of 2001
(Introduced in House) [H.R.3110.IH]
-
Aviation and Transportation Security Act (Enrolled as
Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate) [S.1447.ENR]
-
USA (Introduced in House) [H.R.3555.IH]
-
Bioterrorism Protection Act (BioPAct) of 2001
(Introduced in House) [H.R.3255.IH]
â Last month I talked
about the two University of Cambridge computer security researchers who
have cracked a chip for less than $30. The full Cambridge release can be
found at http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/news/pr/2002051401.html.
If you think this is not such a big problem, think about this:
EPROMs and EEPROMs have a tendency to fail if they are
subjected to high instances of radiation. Radiation like those produced by
equipment used for irradiating food for example. By controlling the amount
of radiation, it is possible to erase all or part of a chips memory and
then replace it with your own information. It doesn’t matter if we are
talking smart cards, RFID chips, or just plain ICs. The problem exists.
See this press release from the Compact Flash Association: http://www.compactflash.org/pr/020107b.pdf
â Continuing on the theme
of looking for invention. Researchers at the University of Florida have
found a way to send wireless signals across the chip. This breakthrough
could easily herald a new era for wireless communications including RFID.
Integrating the antenna into the chip has been done by others including
Hitachi ( http://www.hitachi.com/about/pressroom/a-2001-Jul-5-ZZZM9WXNSOC.html
and http://www.hitachi.com/products/electronic/semiconductorcomponent/elecrfid/index.html),
and the University of Pittsburgh(http://www.postgazette.com/healthscience/20020128antenna0128p2.asp)
and is seen as a way to get the cost of the tag down. http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/17990.html
â And yet more
innovation. NASA has developed a way to spray thin film patterns onto
almost anything metallic (and some non-metallic surfaces). This includes
integrated circuits such as would be used for RFID. Is this the ultimate
way to decrease the price of the chip? To see more details visit http://techtran.msfc.nasa.gov/tech_ops/Spray-on_Circuits2-TOA.pdf
â In the UK, the
Government’s program "Chipping of Goods" took a hit as it
announced three new partners in trials of Radio Frequency Identification
(RFID) technology. Woolworths, Dell, and EMI are the latest firms to sign
up to this the Home Office's Chipping of Goods initiative. The goal
of putting the tags on CDs, laptop computers and consignments of clothing
is to help stamp out the illicit trade in stolen and counterfeit goods. . http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page5046.asp
and http://www.theregus.com/content/7/25047.html
. However, the participation of Dell Computers seems to have received a
mixed reception: http://www.vnunet.com/News/1132211
â Also in the UK, the BBC
(British Broadcasting Corporation) posted a news item about the amount of
theft of books, mostly children’s and travel books. About £750m ($1.125
billion) worth of books are stolen a year. There is a proposal to put
chips in the spines of the books to help combat this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1958000/1958424.stm
â Most of you have
probably been following what news there has been about the MIT "Town
Test" and the implementation of RFID to track the supply chain. An
article was featured in the Cincinnati
News web site and it has been picked up at slashdot.com as a topic for discussion. To
read how "real" people feel about this technology visit: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/04/0220232&mode=thread&tid=158
â Remember the item about
chipping people, well the latest news is that the company (Digital Angel)
has started a series of 30 minute commercials on select US Cable channels.
For more on this: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/25640.html
And no sooner had I finished typing this than the
following news came in, and it appears the company is having some
problems: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27917
â Think about the events
that we have reported in on the Biometrics arena. No technology is 100%
secure, but a lot of the problems that have arisen seem to be based around
the fact that the technology did not work exactly as some of the
manufacturers suggested. This has the potential for a disaster in any
technology, especially a "new" technology.
While there is plenty of work being done in RFID standards
(see report below), what does it mean to the user? Does a standard
guarantee performance or compatibility? If it comes to that, what is
compatibility?
Most standards certainly do not guarantee performance. In
fact most do not even touch the subject. So you are back to trying to
compare apples to oranges on a "marketing fact sheet".
And compatibility? In the work on ISO 18000 we have been
using the following definitions:
Compatibility:
Suitability of products, processes or services for use
together under specific conditions to fulfill relevant requirements
without causing unacceptable interactions. Interchangeability,
interoperability, and non-interference are differing levels (or degrees)
of compatibility. Where:
Interchangeability:
The condition that exists between devices or systems that
exhibit equivalent functionality, interface features and performance to
allow one to be exchanged for another, without alteration, and achieve the
same operational service.
Interoperability:
The condition that exists between systems, from different
vendors, to execute bi-directional data exchange functions, in a manner
that allows them to operate effectively together. A guarantee of a certain
level of compatibility between different implementations of the same
standard. The desired level of compatibility is specific to a given
standard, and can be limited to basic services. Interconnection and
interoperability are the main objectives of standardization.
Non-interference:
The condition that exists where standard-compliant
components of various types or of different vendor origins co-exist within
the same space without serious detrimental effect on one another’s
performance. Components are not required to communicate with one another
as part of a common infrastructure, but only to peacefully co-exist.
So, where do you think a standard should take us? I know
of RFID products from different manufacturers that meet a published
standard but really only just meet the Non-Interference criteria. Is this
acceptable? What can be done about it? ISO 18000 has taken some steps to
eliminate this possibility, but do we need more?
Is it time for testing of RFID products? Do we need to
have a laboratory set up to test these products to ensure they really do
as the manufacturers claim? Do we need a "seal of approval"?
Send your comments to
news@hightechaid.com
â On the event side, here
are the conferences you can attend to hear me speaking:
- Frontline Solutions – USA:
In addition to a day full of actionable information and advice,
participants in The 2nd Annual RFID Summit taking place
September 23, 2002, at Chicago’s McCormick Place Convention Center as
part of Frontline Solutions’ Supply Chain Week, will be the
one-of-a-kind RFID User’s Resource Manual that each attendee will receive. This comprehensive take-home manual
is an exclusive benefit offered to RFID Summit participants only.
To register or get more information about The 2nd Annual RFID
Summit and Frontline Solutions’ Supply Chain Week USA, call
877/232-0132 or go to: www.frontlinexpo.com
- Frontline Solutions – Europe
It really will be ….. "THE RFID Event" of the Year!
It is not every day that two industry magazines come together with a
common wish to stage the most comprehensive RFID event that the world has
ever seen. Frontline Solutions Europe and RF Innovations have done just
that and, with the global support of AIM, will present The RFID Event of
2002 in Birmingham, England on 8th, 9th and 10th
October.
The Event runs alongside the Frontline Solutions Europe Exhibition. The
organizers have announced two distinct tracks, each running for 1.5 days.
The RFID Discovery Track is aimed primarily at people who are relatively
new to the technology and will be staged on Tuesday 8th October
from 10.00 – 13.00 and 14.30 – 17.30 and on Wednesday 9th
October from 9.00 – 12.30.
Key topics on the agenda include :
- RFID – Offering you extra efficiency and extra profitability.
- The Importance of managing items.
- A "five minute" coffee break diagnostic.
- Understanding RFID – the business imperative.
- A full half day applications forum, demonstrating the breadth of use
of the technology across industry and application.
- Avoiding the pitfalls.
- The reality on costs.
- The issues involved in justifying RFID in the Supply Chain.
- Don’t wait – Next Steps to Implementation.
Speaker companies already confirmed for this initial
program include Intellident; the Technology Innovation Centre of the
University of Central England; Tagsys, Texas Instruments; Philips Semi
Conductors.
The second track headed "RFID – the New Opportunities" is
aimed at industry and more advanced users. This will run on Wednesday
afternoon 9th October from 14.00 – 17.30 and all day Thursday
from 9.00 – 12.30 and from 14.00 to 16.30.
Major program headings include :
- The RFID Experience.
- Dimensions of Capability.
- Strategic Opportunities for Radical Applications.
- Impact of Standards.
- The need for Universal Protocols.
- Emerging and Future Developments.
Speakers are currently being finalised but already
confirmed will be representatives from Magellan, Accenture, Zebra, Samsys,
Awid, AIM Inc, Technology Innovation Centre of the University of Central
England.
- The Second International Smart Label Conference will be held on October
22-23, 2002 in Rosemont, Chicago, IL, USA.
Conference Objectives. This Conference is designed to
bring together smart label providers and end users in order to further
the product and market development of this exciting technology.
Keynote speaker will be John M. Hill of eSYNC International. Steve
Halliday, President of High Tech Aid and Clive Hohberger, VP of
Technology of Zebra Technologies will be Conference Chairpersons.
Additional Conference Information. Additional information about
this exciting and significant conference will be available at the
following website: www.cbconferences.com
or you can contact George Gilfoil, CB Conferences (800-903-9007).
Editors Note: At publication time the dates on the web site are wrong.
â The last meeting of
ISO/IEC JTC1 SC31/WG4/SG3 (If you don’t know what this means, visit http://www.hightechaid.com/stdsupdate/stds_update3.htm)
was held in Tokyo on 6-7 May, 2002. At that meeting some significant steps
were taken. The ISO 18000 standard is a standard for RFID Air Interfaces
for Item Management in six (soon to be seven) parts. In this meeting 5 of
the current six parts were moved on one stage and approval was given to
encourage a submission of a new part seven. The full details for this
series of standards are:
SG3 ISO 18000 Information Technology AIDC
Techniques-RFID for Item Management - Air Interface
18000 – 1 Part 1 – Generic Parameters for Air
Interface Communication for Globally Accepted Frequencies
18000 – 2 Part 2 – Parameters for Air Interface
Communications below 135 KHz
18000 – 3 Part 3 – Parameters for Air Interface
Communications at 13.56 MHz
18000 – 4 Part 4 – Parameters for Air Interface
Communications at 2.45 GHz
18000 – 5 Part 5 – Parameters for Air Interface
Communications at 5.8 GHz
18000 – 6* Part 6 - Parameters for Air Interface
Communications at 860 – 930 MHz
18000 – 7** Part 7 - Parameters for Air Interface
Communications at 433.92 MHz
A proposal to change the name of Part 6 from UHF to 860
– 930 MHz has been made, to allow the addition of a **new Work Item,
part 7 (also UHF but not in the same frequency range).
In Tokyo, Parts one, three and four were voted to move to
FCD status, and parts five and six were voted to move to CD status. Part
two is currently being revised and will be voted on soon. For more
information on the various stages of JTC1 ballots visit: http://www.hightechaid.com/standards/how_does_iso_work.htm
At this meeting the committee also demonstrations of the
Magellan (part 3 mode 2) and Yoshikawa (part 2) submissions. There is a
requirement to demonstrate that artifacts are available for the
technologies submitted. Along with Intermec (part 4, mode 1) and Qfree
(part 5), this takes the number of companies that have demonstrated
artifacts to four, though only part 3 mode 2, part 4 mode 1, and part 5
have fully satisfied the requirements.
The group also had a discussion on Intellectual Property
and its impact on the standards (more next month on this subject) as well
as a lengthy discussion on how to ensure that all tags made to one of the
standards are compatible with each other and do not allow for options
which prevent universal usage.
â If you are very
interested in RFID Standards and would like to get up-to-date reports on
the work that is happening, send me an email to steve@hightechaid.com
and I will send you details of how you can subscribe to a standards
report.
â And to finish for this
month, an eternal question: Why does hair turn grey? The answer
courtesy of New Scientist magazine ( http://www.newscientist.com/lastword/answers/93body.jsp)
tells you all.
- To get your own copy of this newsletter, simply visit
http://www.hightechaid.com
and fill out the subscription information. To unsubscribe send an email
to news@hightechaid.com
with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Do not reply to the
newsletter email, it may not get read.
- A reminder. If you get the newsletter, you do not need to subscribe
again. If you subscribe just after the issue comes out, you will not
get another issue for a month, so multiple subscriptions will not help
you. If you need a back issue, check the web site at
http://www.hightechaid.com.
Back issues get posted as soon as I can. The newsletter comes out around
the 15th of the month (give or take a day or so, depending on my travel
schedule), so if you subscribe immediately after a new issue comes out
(and most people do), don't despair if you don't see the newsletter
arrive for a while, and you don’t need to re-subscribe, your first
issue will be on its way to you within a month.
- Tell us what you want from the newsletter,
news@hightechaid.com,
and don't forget to tell your friends to subscribe.
- All material is copyright (c) High Tech Aid, 2002 unless otherwise
stated, however permission is granted to circulate this publication
via manual forwarding by e-mail to friends and/or co-workers providing
that 1) the text is forwarded in its entirety, from the title line on
top through the end of this paragraph, and 2) no fee is charged.
- We request that you forward no more than three copies to any one
person -- after that, they should get their own FREE subscription. To
sign up for your own copy of this newsletter or get back issues, visit
http://www.hightechaid.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm
(you only need to sign up once, and you will continue to receive the
newsletter until you unsubscribe by sending email to news@hightechaid.com?subject=unsubscribe
|