A Standards Update - AIDC Standards
Welcome to this edition of a regular column about standards in
the Automatic Identification and Data Capture (AIDC) industry. This column will
be updated regularly to keep you current on news of standards and their impact
on the industry.
In the coming months, we will try to educate you on the various
technologies covered under the AIDC umbrella as well as bring news of the
standardization process and its progress. If you have news about standards that
you want to share, or questions you want to ask, send them to steve@hightechaid.com
and we will try to incorporate them into the next column.
In last month's issue of this column, we summarized the Fast
track process at JTC 1. This month we will start looking at the various AIDC
technologies and who is involved in standardization in these technologies.
AIDC technologies cover many areas including barcode, RFID, RFDC,
magnetic stripe, optical card, smart card, contactless card, biometrics, vision
and EAS. The standardization for this wide variety of technologies does not all
occur in the same place and to further complicate matters, there are two types
of standards that cover this industry.
The first type of standard is a technology standard. This type
of standard is the base line for the creation of a product that uses the
technology. An example of this is a barcode symbology standard. The majority of
the symbology standards that exist today have been created by AIM (For a list of
AIM Symbology standards visit http://www.aimglobal.org/aimstore/default.htm).
Some of these barcode standards are currently being used as the basis for
standardization at the JTC 1 level by SC31 (http://www.uc-council.com/sc31/home.htm).
Others where the international demand is not there will remain as AIM standards.
AIM is also working on the standardization of other symbologies and a list can
be found at http://www.aimglobal.org/standards/standards_in_progress.htm.
Other technologies are standardized by other groups. At JTC 1
the Sub Committee responsible for card technology standards is SC17. They are
creating technology standards for magnetic stripe, smart card, optical card, and
contactless smart cards. You can visit the SC17 web site at http://www.sc17.com.
Biometrics standards are just starting to be developed and a
good reference to the work that is going on can be found at http://www.biometrics.org/html/standards.html.
RFID standards are being developed by SC31 along with barcode,
data syntax, and conformance standards. There is also work being done at
national levels by some countries. For a list of some of the international,
regional, and national standards bodies visit http://www.aimglobal.org/standards/stndrdorgs.htm
The second type of standard is what I will term an application
standard. In this case a standard is written that will call upon a technology
standard as the basis for the implementation of an application. An example of
this might be the AIAG standard for Parts Identification and Tracking
Application. This application standard defines specifications for both direct
marking and labeling of individual parts, kits, assemblies/ subassemblies, unit
packs and subpacks, using both Code 39 linear bar codes and Data Matrix two
dimensional symbols. The standard describes technical requirements for the
symbols, format rules for the data in the symbols, and rules for printing the
human-readable interpretation.
In the case of an application standard it is typically the
application industry that writes the standard (as in the case above where AIAG
wrote the standard for automotive parts marking). The application standard makes
reference to the technology standard(s) (in this case Code 39 and Data Matrix),
so that the implementation of the symbology itself is correct, but the
application standard details how to use the symbology to encode the needed
information and what that information should be.
For a list of application standards developers for various
industries see http://www.aimglobal.org/resources/industry_organizations.htm.
You will see that this list of standards developers covers a wide variety of
applications and is probably not all inclusive. You should be able to find a
link to the standards you are looking for from this page.
In the next column we will delve a bit deeper into each
technology and the standardization work that is being done.
|